Let them use it
AI usability testing: simulated people use your live site
Give simulated people your site and a task, such as signing up or reaching checkout. Each one opens it in their own real browser and clicks, scrolls, types and fills in your forms, with an email inbox of their own for verification codes. You see how far each one got, where they got stuck, and why, in their own words.
Can AI agents test my website like real users?
They can use it the way a newcomer would, but they cannot predict what your visitors will do. In a Mimiq flow, each simulated person opens your live site in a real browser, clicks, scrolls, types and fills in forms to do a task, and says why they stopped. That finds confusing steps and dead ends. In a pre-registered test, simulated shoppers did what real shoppers did next on only 8% of steps, so a flow is a usability check, not a forecast.
Why someone should try the site before your visitors do
The team that built a flow cannot see it fresh. Usability sessions with real people show where newcomers struggle, but they take days to recruit and schedule, so most flows ship before anyone outside the team has tried them. Analytics shows the drop-off only after real visitors hit it. A flow in Mimiq sends simulated newcomers through first, so the obvious dead ends are fixed before anyone real meets them.
- Real browsers and a real task: they click, scroll, type, fill in forms, go back, wait, and check their email.
- Each person has a profile, such as an age, a job, a country and a comfort with technology, and decides every step from what is on their screen.
- See who finished, got partway, or gave up, step by step, and why, in their own words.
- Fix it, then send the same people through again with the same task.
How it works
- 01
Pick the task
Choose one path a new visitor should be able to finish, such as 'Sign up and start using it', booking a demo, or getting to checkout. Start from a public page, since the people cannot log in to an existing account.
- 02
Choose the people
Pick 1, 3, 5 or 10 people. Mimiq matches them to who the site is for, or you describe them in plain words, or import your own customers as simulated twins.
- 03
Watch them try
Each person gets up to 15 steps in their own real browser. You watch their screens and every step as it happens: a click, a scroll, a form filled in, an email opened.
- 04
Fix the shared blocker
The report ranks the issues by how many people hit them, each with a suggested fix and the people behind it. Fix the top one, then run it again on the same people.
What the simulated people do
At every step, each person looks at their screen and decides what to do next: click, scroll, type, fill in a form, go back, wait, check their email, or give up. Nobody scripts the path. They get lost where a newcomer might, and they say what they were thinking at each step.
When a form asks for details, they use their own, which are made up, since they are simulated: a name from their profile, an email address on a Mimiq domain with a working inbox, and a password Mimiq sets for them. So a verification code or a confirmation link reaches them, and they can carry on.
A session ends when they say they are done, give up, get blocked by the site, or reach 15 steps. It counts as finished only when their own last steps show the task done, not because they say so.
What a flow finds
The problems a newcomer hits and an insider never sees: a button that does nothing, a label that means something else to an outsider, an error message that does not say what to fix, a form that will not accept what people type, a required step with no reason given, or a price that appears only after the account is made.
Every click and form entry is recorded with what it did: moved the person on, changed nothing on screen, or failed. So a dead button stands out in the step-by-step view, next to what the person said about it.
How it differs from automated tests and session replay
An end-to-end test follows a script and checks that the flow works. It passes as long as the button does what the code says, even when no newcomer would find the button. A Mimiq flow checks whether someone who has never seen the site gets through, which is a different question, so most teams want both.
Session replay and funnel analytics show what real visitors already did, after launch. A flow runs before anyone real arrives, and each simulated person explains their choices in words. Once you have traffic, your analytics are the better evidence for what is happening.
What the evidence says
Flows are checked in the same public register as everything else, and the results so far argue for using them as a usability check only. In one pre-registered run, simulated people browsing a real shop did what the real shopper did next on 8% of 200 steps, and a simple rule did better at guessing the kind of action.
In another, on real sign-up page tests with published results, flows showed people getting through both versions but could not tell which one won. So a flow shows where people like your visitors can get stuck. It does not forecast how many will finish, or which of two versions converts better.
Limits
They cannot log in to an existing account, sign in with Google or another account, or pay: Mimiq gives them no payment details. A CAPTCHA or bot check can stop them. Anyone stopped by one is marked as blocked by the site, and if it stops everyone, the flow fails and nothing is charged. A staging or preview address without bot protection works, as long as it is public.
Each person gets up to 15 steps, enough for a sign-up and the first screens after it, not a long setup. People take turns on shared browsers, so a flow takes a few minutes, and it uses 30 credits a person.
They really submit your forms, so each person who signs up leaves a test account, and on a store they can leave abandoned carts. Use a staging site if that matters, as long as it is public.
Questions
Is this the same as an AI QA testing tool?
No. QA tools check that a flow works as specified. Mimiq's simulated people try to use it as newcomers and say where it confused them or where they gave up. A flow can pass every QA check and still lose people.
Do they really fill in my forms?
Yes, with made-up details from their profile and an email address of their own on a Mimiq domain, with a working inbox. Each person who gets through your sign-up leaves a test account on your site.
Can they log in to my app?
No. They cannot log in to an existing account, so a flow starts from a public page and can include signing up. Screens they cannot reach can be reviewed as screenshots of up to four steps.
How long does a flow take?
A few minutes for up to 3 people, about 5 to 10 minutes for 5, and about 10 to 20 minutes for 10. People take turns on shared browsers, so it can take longer when other flows are running, and you can close the tab and come back.
Will it tell me my conversion rate?
No. It shows where people like your visitors can get stuck and why. In pre-registered tests, flows could not rank two versions of a sign-up page, so use analytics or a live experiment for rates.
What if my site has a CAPTCHA or bot protection?
It can stop them. Anyone stopped by one is marked as blocked by the site, and if it stops everyone, the flow fails and nothing is charged. A staging or preview address without bot protection works, as long as it is public.
What does it cost?
Your first test is free with no account, and it can be a flow of up to 3 people. Free flows have a daily limit across all visitors; once it is reached, a free account runs yours right away. A free account adds 100 credits, enough for 3 people in a flow. After that a flow uses 30 credits a person, and packs start at $29 for 500 credits, bought once. Credits never expire.
Can my coding agent run a flow?
Yes. Mimiq's MCP server has a flow tool, so Claude Code, Cursor and similar agents can send simulated people through a sign-up they just built. The address has to be public, so a local build needs a tunnel first.
Keep reading
Find the step that loses people.
Last checked 2026-09-25.