Test client pages before the pitch or launch

Every round of "I just don't love the headline" costs billable hours, and the loudest person in the meeting usually wins. Real research would settle it, but few briefs have the budget for a study on every draft. A quick simulated read gives the conversation evidence, and gives you objections to fix before the client finds them.

• Before a pitch: run the prospect's current page and bring the objections to the meeting.
• Before a launch: catch unclear headlines, missing proof and broken flows before the client does.
• During reviews: compare two directions on the same simulated customers.
• After the test: share a read-only report, a CSV, or a printed PDF.

Run the prospect's current homepage or landing page with an audience that matches their market. In about 90 seconds you have 25 simulated customers' reactions and the objections they raised most. Bringing those to a pitch shows you have looked at the page through their customers' eyes, not just your own.

Be clear about what it is. Present it as a simulated first read, not customer research, and let the objections speak: "simulated buyers could not find the price" is a fair opening; "your customers hate your page" is not.

Run every key page before handoff. A page test catches unclear value propositions, missing proof and vague calls to action. A flow catches the sign-up or checkout step where newcomers get stuck: each simulated person uses the staging site in a real browser for up to 40 steps. A staging address works if it is public and has no login or bot check in front of it.

Test the campaign assets the same way: ad images, a video of up to 3 minutes, launch emails and headline options.

When the client and the team disagree between two directions, run both on the same saved audience. The same simulated customers see both, so the comparison shows who changed their mind and why, and Mimiq says whether the difference is likely to be chance or too close to call.

Be honest about how far a call goes. On 1,000 real headline A/B tests held out from its development, Mimiq's forecast picked the headline more readers clicked 76% of the time; the best rule of thumb, picking the headline written first, got 61%. Mimiq's forecast has held up on headlines. In pre-registered tests on emails, text messages and ads, it was no better than chance at ranking small wording changes, and on real web page tests it did not beat the simplest guess. So a call between two headlines carries more weight than a call between two whole pages, where the reasons are the useful part.

Every report has a read-only link you can send to a client or stakeholder, and shared reports stay out of search results. You can download everyone as a CSV, save parts of the report as images, or print it to PDF, and every printed page says the people are simulated.

Save an audience for each client and reuse it, so every new draft is tested on the same simulated people as the last one.

There are no seats to buy: you pay for credits, with a $9 Starter (120 credits that never expire) or monthly plans from $49.

Open a sample report

Do not present simulated results as a client's customer research, a conversion forecast or a guarantee. Everyone in a Mimiq report is simulated, and it predicts direction, not the size of a change.

For clients in narrow expert markets, such as clinicians or industrial buyers, treat the results as hypotheses and confirm the key ones with a few real customers.