Before you launch or pay for traffic
Best practices for writing landing page copy
Your copy reads clearly to you because you already know the product. A simulated visitor brings only their own problem and their own words, and shows which sentence stopped them.
What are the best practices for writing landing page copy?
Write each sentence so a stranger can picture the thing it names, can see the step that produces each benefit, and can find one proof point beside each claim. Replace the vocabulary you use inside the product with the words of the problem the visitor brings, and say each claim once. A simulated test reads the copy as a stranger would and shows the sentence where each visitor stopped, with the thought they wrote at that point.
What this looks like in a report
“Real-time collaboration and peace of mind for your workflow. I know what I want, a place for client documents. This does not say it. Is it a portal, a file share, or something else?”
The fix. Replace the three feature headings with what a client can do in the folder. Name the category in the subheading, such as a client portal for accountants.
An illustration. Run a test to see your own.See a real sample report
Your words are the product's words, not the visitor's
After months with a product, its vocabulary feels like plain English. A visitor arrives with a task and a different set of words for it, usually the words of the problem they have. When the copy speaks in product terms, the visitor has to translate each sentence before they can judge it, and some will not bother. The copy has not failed to be clear to you. It has failed to be the visitor's language.
- Every noun in the headline names something a stranger could point at on the screen.
- Each benefit sits beside the step that produces it, in the same sentence.
- No claim appears twice, and each one has a plain proof or a named case beside it.
- The button label is a verb and an outcome, such as Start a free trial or Get a quote.
Replace the nouns a visitor cannot picture
Platform, workflow, solution and ecosystem describe the product from the outside. A visitor cannot point at one on screen, so the sentence gives them nothing to picture. The wrong version reads: a unified platform that streamlines your workflow. The right version names what the visitor would see: a folder for each client, with uploads inside it. Each noun in the headline should be a thing a stranger could circle on the screen. If a noun only sounds like a product, cut it.
Watch the verbs as well. Empower, grow and transform describe a feeling the visitor is supposed to have, not an action they take. Write the verb the buyer would use for the task, such as send, upload, invoice or book, and the sentence starts to point at something real. A verb like that also tells the visitor what their first click will do.
Turn each benefit into the step that produces it
Save time and get more done are benefits without a mechanism, so the visitor's next thought is always how. The right version puts the step beside the benefit in one sentence: send the month's invoices from the saved client list, instead of copying figures from a spreadsheet. A stranger can see the saving because they can see the step it replaces.
Benefits that sound like feelings need the same treatment. Peace of mind, confidence and relief are what a buyer hopes to feel after the job is done, and they do not tell the buyer what the job is. Name the job, and let the feeling follow from it without being written down. A buyer who knows the job is done will feel the relief without help from the copy.
Say each claim once, and put proof beside it
Repetition feels like emphasis to the writer and like padding to the reader. A page that says the product saves hours in the headline, the features and the footer makes the visitor skim, and they skim past the one sentence that mattered. Works for every team is a claim with nothing under it. The right version attaches the claim to a named task, a named kind of business, or a plain statement the visitor can check.
Proof does not need to be large. A sentence that says what a customer did, in the words they would use, works better than a badge. If you have no case to name yet, say so plainly and describe the test you ran, with the actual count of what happened in it. A visitor can weigh a line like that, and it does not claim more than you know.
Read the copy as the visitor's first thought, then edit
The report gives each visitor's step and the thought they had there. Read the thought beside the line it followed. A thought that asks what the product is points to a noun the visitor cannot picture. A thought that asks how it works points to a benefit with no step. A thought that says everyone says that points to a claim with no proof. A thought that asks which button to press points to a label that names no action.
Edit one of those, then rerun the same visitors. A visitor who repeats your words back, in their own sentence, is the sign the copy now works for this kind of buyer. If a thought is unclear, ask the visitor a question after the run, such as what they expected the headline to mean, and use their answer in the next edit rather than your own guess.
What you get with Mimiq
- 01
Run it by hand, or on every pull request
Paste a link and a task in the app and watch the visitors work. Or run them on every preview deploy: the GitHub Action comments on the pull request, any other CI can call the MCP endpoint, and your coding agent can run it too.
- 02
Bugs and usability problems in one report
The browser records errors and failed or slow requests on the step they happened. The visitors say where the wording or the steps confused them, and where they left.
- 03
Visitors that behave like your audience
Each visitor is a different profile with a reason to be there, matched to who the page is for, described by you, or built from your own customers.
- 04
A prompt to fix each problem
Every problem comes with a fix to paste into Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable or any coding agent, and one prompt hands over the top problems at once. Then send the same visitors through again.
- 05
Follow every visitor
See each visitor's whole path, step by step with screenshots, and what it was thinking at every step. Ask any visitor a question.
The browser records relevant JavaScript errors and failed or slow app requests encountered during the run, attached to the step where they occurred. The visitors are simulated: they find problems, they do not predict how many real people will convert.
A rewritten headline can pick up a vague word in the next edit
Copy drifts back toward product vocabulary. A new hire, a launch deadline or a fresh idea for the hero can bring the word platform back into the headline. Rerun the same visitors after each rewrite, on a preview address, and check their first thought against the words you meant to use.
Starter
Try it on one launch
About 4 tests of 5 visitors
- Visitors on your landing page, signup and checkout
- Where they left and why, with a fix to copy for each problem
- Run it in the app or on every pull request
- Ask any visitor a question, included
- Test accounts and protected previews
Builder
Test every build
About 20 tests of 5 visitors
- Everything in Starter
- Credits refill each month, and what is left rolls over once
- Cancel anytime
Pro
Test every release, as a team
About 60 tests of 5 visitors
- Everything in Starter
- Credits refill each month, and what is left rolls over once
- Cancel anytime
Scale
Test at scale, every day
About 240 tests of 5 visitors
- Everything in Starter
- Credits refill each month, and what is left rolls over once
- Priority support
- Cancel anytime
Questions
Should I write copy around search keywords?
Use the words a buyer types where they fit naturally in the headline and the first lines. Repeating a keyword in every heading makes the page read like an ad, and a visitor who notices stops trusting the rest. Test it with a visitor who arrived from that search, and read where their thought breaks.
Does a shorter page need less copy?
It needs fewer claims, not thinner ones. A short page with one specific sentence per question can work for a simple product. A long vague page still leaves the visitor asking what it does. Count the questions a visitor must answer, then write one specific sentence for each.
Can a simulated visitor tell me whether my copy sells?
No. It does not predict sales, and it gives no rate for any version of the copy. It shows whether a visitor could say what the product does, which sentence stopped them and what they wrote. Sales come from your analytics.
Should the page repeat the wording of my ads?
Where the ad makes a promise, the page should repeat that promise in its first line. The test can compare the ad's words with the headline a visitor reads. If the ad promises one thing and the page opens on another, a visitor who came from the ad can stop before they reach the button.
Keep reading
Send visitors and see what breaks first.
Your first test is free: sign in with Google and it starts right away. Last checked 2026-11-02.