Before you launch or pay for traffic
Landing page checker: the faults it cannot see
A checker can give your page a clean score and still leave a visitor stuck on the booking form. Here is what a checker reads, and the faults it never reaches.
What does a landing page checker miss?
A landing page checker reads the page as a document, so it finds missing titles, weak headings, broken links and slow loads. It cannot see a field that rejects a valid address, a button under a cookie notice, or a thank-you page that never draws, because those appear only after a click. A simulated visitor arrives at the public address with no history, goes through the path, and shows the step where each one stopped, with a screenshot. Use the checker for the page and the test for the path.
What this looks like in a report
“The page looks fine and the headline matches what my colleague said. The time picker will not offer the afternoon, and the button stays gray. I cannot tell if I am missing a step or the form is broken.”
The fix. Let the time picker offer afternoon slots in the visitor's own time zone, and show a message beside the button when no slot is chosen. Run the booking form again from a fresh browser after the change.
An illustration. Run a test to see your own.See a real sample report
A checker reads the page as a document, a visitor uses it
A landing page checker reads the page the way a search engine or a code scanner does. It looks at the title, the description, the headings, the alt text on images, the links it can find, and how long the page takes to load. Those are real things, and a page can fail them while visitors still get through. It never types, clicks or waits for the next screen, so it cannot find the form that rejects a valid address, the button a banner covers, or the thank-you page that never loads. Those faults live in a sequence, and a document check never runs the sequence.
- Every field accepts the formats a visitor types, not only the one the owner tested.
- No cookie notice, sticky bar or chat widget covers the main button on a phone.
- A click on the main button reaches the screen it names, and that screen finishes loading.
- Errors appear beside the field that caused them, after submit, not only at the top.
- The thank-you page shows after submit, and the confirmation email arrives.
What a document check reads, and what it leaves out
Start with what the checker does well. It reads the title and the description, and it can tell you whether the description is missing, too long or repeats the title. It checks the heading order, the alt text on images, and whether links point to pages that exist. It can measure load time from its own connection. Those checks matter for search and for visitors who use assistive tools, and a failing one is worth fixing. What they do not show is what happens after the first click, because the checker never clicks anything.
Three tells that the fault sits in a step
If the checker scores the page well and a visitor still cannot finish, the fault is in a step. Look for three tells. The visitor stops on a field, and the error appears only after a tap. The visitor stops on a button that is visible but sits under another layer, such as a cookie notice or a sticky bar, so the click lands on the layer. Or the visitor reaches a thank-you page that never draws. Each tell appears in a screenshot of the step where the visitor stopped. A document check can pass all three while the visitor is stuck on the same page.
Ways to check a landing page, side by side
Each method answers a different question. A document checker answers whether the page is built well. Analytics shows where traffic drops, but not why. Session replay shows what a real visitor did, but only once real visitors arrive. A scripted end-to-end test checks the steps someone wrote down, so it catches a regression in a flow you already know. A simulated visitor arrives with no history and moves through the path looking for the next step. Use the table to choose, and use more than one.
What to fix first when a checker and a visitor disagree
When the checker's list is long and the visitor's list is short, fix the visitor's list first. A missing meta description costs little, because visitors never see it on the page. A field that rejects a valid postal code stops every buyer who types one. Start at the step where the visitor stopped, in the report, and fix the blocking thing there. Then run the checker again, because a fix to a link or a redirect can change what it reports, and run the visitor again to see whether they get further.
Ways to check a landing page, and what each one can see
| Method | Finds | Misses |
|---|---|---|
| Document checker that reads the page | Missing titles, weak headings, broken links, slow loads | Any field, button or step that fails only after a click |
| Analytics | Where traffic drops between pages | Why a visitor left, and what they saw on screen |
| Session replay of real visitors | What a real visitor did, step by step | Anything before real visitors arrive, and visitors who never reach the page |
| Scripted end-to-end test | Breaks in the steps someone wrote down | Steps nobody thought to script, and a stranger's first reaction |
| Simulated visitor from a public address | Stops on fields, buttons and screens, with a screenshot | Real demand, rates, and what a real buyer decides to do |
Rows name methods, not products. Pick the one that matches the question you have.
What you get with Mimiq
- 01
Run it by hand, or on every pull request
Paste a link and a task in the app and watch the visitors work. Or run them on every preview deploy: the GitHub Action comments on the pull request, any other CI can call the MCP endpoint, and your coding agent can run it too.
- 02
Bugs and usability problems in one report
The browser records errors and failed or slow requests on the step they happened. The visitors say where the wording or the steps confused them, and where they left.
- 03
Visitors that behave like your audience
Each visitor is a different profile with a reason to be there, matched to who the page is for, described by you, or built from your own customers.
- 04
A prompt to fix each problem
Every problem comes with a fix to paste into Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable or any coding agent, and one prompt hands over the top problems at once. Then send the same visitors through again.
- 05
Follow every visitor
See each visitor's whole path, step by step with screenshots, and what it was thinking at every step. Ask any visitor a question.
The browser records relevant JavaScript errors and failed or slow app requests encountered during the run, attached to the step where they occurred. The visitors are simulated: they find problems, they do not predict how many real people will convert.
A new redirect or form field can break a step the score never tested
A checker score describes the document, so it can stay the same while a form field, a redirect or a booking widget changes underneath it. Run the same first-time visitors through the path after each change, and read the step where each one stopped.
Starter
Try it on one launch
About 4 tests of 5 visitors
- Visitors on your landing page, signup and checkout
- Where they left and why, with a fix to copy for each problem
- Run it in the app or on every pull request
- Ask any visitor a question, included
- Test accounts and protected previews
Builder
Test every build
About 20 tests of 5 visitors
- Everything in Starter
- Credits refill each month, and what is left rolls over once
- Cancel anytime
Pro
Test every release, as a team
About 60 tests of 5 visitors
- Everything in Starter
- Credits refill each month, and what is left rolls over once
- Cancel anytime
Scale
Test at scale, every day
About 240 tests of 5 visitors
- Everything in Starter
- Credits refill each month, and what is left rolls over once
- Priority support
- Cancel anytime
Questions
Does a high score mean visitors can use the page?
Not on its own. A high score means the document is in order. Visitors use fields, buttons and screens, and those can fail even when the document is clean. The step-level test shows which step each visitor stopped at, with a screenshot of that step.
Which checker findings are worth fixing first?
The ones that stop a visitor from reaching the next step: a button that does nothing, a field that rejects valid input, a redirect that loops. Titles and descriptions matter for search results, and they are worth fixing once the path works.
Can a checker tell me whether my prices are right?
No. It can read the numbers on the page, but it cannot tell you whether they match your plan settings or what a buyer will be charged. Compare the prices with your own settings, and place one real order with a card you own.
How often should I run either check?
After each change that touches the path: the headline, the form, the booking widget, a redirect or a script. A check on a fixed schedule finds little that a recent change did not cause, so run it when something moves.
Keep reading
Send visitors and see what breaks first.
Your first test is free: sign in with Google and it starts right away. Last checked 2026-11-02.