By platform
Kajabi checkout page design: where buyers stall
Your sales page makes a promise, and the checkout shows a title, a price and a form. Simulated buyers walk the offer through checkout and report the screen where each one stopped.
What should a Kajabi checkout page show a buyer?
The checkout should show the same offer, price and promise the buyer read on the sales page, in the same words. Put the price and any plan choice above the form, and keep the payment fields reachable on a phone without scrolling past a long summary. A simulated test walks the offer through checkout and reports the screen where each buyer stopped.
What this looks like in a report
“The sales page said one price, and the checkout shows a monthly option next to a full price. I cannot tell which one the course page meant, and the headline names a bundle I never read about.”
The fix. Show one price on checkout that matches the sales page, with the plan choice labeled as a second option beneath it. Repeat the course name and the refund terms above the form, then check both prices on a phone before you publish.
An illustration. Run a test to see your own.See a real sample report
The buyer changes page, and the reasons to buy stay behind
A buyer reads a sales page, decides the course is worth it, and presses a button that opens a separate checkout page. The reasons they read a minute ago, such as the outcome, the reviews and the refund terms, do not travel with them unless you copy them over. What they often see is an offer name, a price and a form asking for a name, an email and payment. If the checkout headline names something they did not read about, or the price looks higher than the sales page, they stop to work out which one is right. That pause is where a close sale is lost.
- Read the checkout headline beside the sales page headline. Do they name the same course?
- Compare the price on both pages, including any plan or monthly option. Does the buyer see one number?
- Open checkout on a phone. Can you reach the payment fields without scrolling past the summary?
- Check that the refund terms and the course promise still appear on the checkout screen.
- Read the line under the payment button. Does it say what the buyer receives after paying?
Keep the promise on the checkout screen
Wrong: a checkout that shows only the course title, a price and three fields. Right: the same title, one line of the outcome the sales page promised, and the refund terms in the same words. The wrong version asks the buyer to trust a page that has forgotten why they came. The buyer reads checkout once, right before paying, so repeat the two or three reasons they agreed with a minute earlier, and nothing more.
Two prices and a plan choice need one clear answer
A monthly option next to a one-time price is a decision the buyer has to make without much context. If the sales page shows one number and checkout shows another, the buyer has to decide which one is real, and many will not try. Label each option with what it costs in total and how often it renews, then put the default choice the one the sales page advertised. A discount code can add a third number, so check the price with and without it.
Phone layouts put the payment fields below the summary
On a phone, a long order summary can push the name, email and payment fields below the first screen. The buyer scrolls, reads the summary again, and wonders whether the page has finished loading. Keep the course name and the price at the top, then the fields, then the summary. Open the live checkout on a phone, in a private window, and count how many scrolls it takes to reach the payment button.
Read the checkout beside the page that sent the buyer
Open the sales page and the checkout side by side, then compare the headline, the price, the plan names and the refund line. Any difference is a question a buyer will ask in the moment, and most will not ask it out loud. Mark each mismatch with the screen it appears on. A simulated buyer records each screen it reaches, so the same mismatch shows up in the report on the step where the buyer met it.
Mimiq is independent and not affiliated with the platforms it names. Names belong to their owners.
What you get with Mimiq
- 01
Run it by hand, or on every pull request
Paste a link and a task in the app and watch the visitors work. Or run them on every preview deploy: the GitHub Action comments on the pull request, any other CI can call the MCP endpoint, and your coding agent can run it too.
- 02
Bugs and usability problems in one report
The browser records errors and failed or slow requests on the step they happened. The visitors say where the wording or the steps confused them, and where they left.
- 03
Visitors that behave like your audience
Each visitor is a different profile with a reason to be there, matched to who the page is for, described by you, or built from your own customers.
- 04
A prompt to fix each problem
Every problem comes with a fix to paste into Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable or any coding agent, and one prompt hands over the top problems at once. Then send the same visitors through again.
- 05
Follow every visitor
See each visitor's whole path, step by step with screenshots, and what it was thinking at every step. Ask any visitor a question.
The browser records relevant JavaScript errors and failed or slow app requests encountered during the run, attached to the step where they occurred. The visitors are simulated: they find problems, they do not predict how many real people will convert.
A new bundle or price change next month can split the checkout again
Every new offer, price change or bundle is a new checkout that a buyer may reach from an old sales page link. After each change, open a sales page link you already shared, click through to payment, and compare the prices and the headline. Old links in emails and social posts still send buyers, so check those too.
Starter
Try it on one launch
About 4 tests of 5 visitors
- Visitors on your landing page, signup and checkout
- Where they left and why, with a fix to copy for each problem
- Run it in the app or on every pull request
- Ask any visitor a question, included
- Test accounts and protected previews
Builder
Test every build
About 20 tests of 5 visitors
- Everything in Starter
- Credits refill each month, and what is left rolls over once
- Cancel anytime
Pro
Test every release, as a team
About 60 tests of 5 visitors
- Everything in Starter
- Credits refill each month, and what is left rolls over once
- Cancel anytime
Scale
Test at scale, every day
About 240 tests of 5 visitors
- Everything in Starter
- Credits refill each month, and what is left rolls over once
- Priority support
- Cancel anytime
Questions
Will a checkout design change help more buyers pay?
It might, but a simulated test cannot tell you how much. It does not predict conversion. It shows whether the headline, the price and the fields match the sales page, and where a simulated buyer stopped. Take the real rate from your own sales numbers.
Can a simulated buyer pay for the course?
No. The run goes up to the payment step and stops there, because a simulated buyer cannot pay with a real card. Check the payment result yourself, using whatever test setup the platform gives you, before you send buyers to the page.
Should the checkout repeat the whole sales page?
No. Repeat only what a buyer needs at the moment of paying: the course name, the price, the plan and the refund terms. Long copy on checkout reopens a decision the buyer already made. The page should confirm the choice, not argue for it again.
Can the run tell me which price is the right one?
No. It shows what each price said on each screen and whether they matched. Which price you mean to charge is your decision, and the run does not judge pricing for you.
What if the checkout uses a discount code?
Run the same offer with and without the code. A code can change the price on one screen and leave it unchanged on the next, and a buyer notices that far more than the owner who set the code up.
Keep reading
Send visitors and see what breaks first.
Your first test is free: sign in with Google and it starts right away. Last checked 2026-11-02.